TickerTain
TickerTain
NewsroomShortsPortfolioConvergence
NewsroomShortsPortfolioConvergence
$ANTHROPIC·$MA····$INTC····$BLUE-ORIGIN·$SPCX····$CRWV····$CRM····$MSFT····$NVDA····$ORCL····$CURSOR·$AAPL····$OPENAI·$AMZN····$UBER····$GOOGL····$META····$TSLA····$DATABRICKS·$PERPLEXITY·$LYFT····$NBIS····$TSM····$LITE····$ANDURIL·
$ANTHROPIC·$MA····$INTC····$BLUE-ORIGIN·$SPCX····$CRWV····$CRM····$MSFT····$NVDA····$ORCL····$CURSOR·$AAPL····$OPENAI·$AMZN····$UBER····$GOOGL····$META····$TSLA····$DATABRICKS·$PERPLEXITY·$LYFT····$NBIS····$TSM····$LITE····$ANDURIL·
←

brendan foody

T2 · manager / operator

Founder and CEO of Mercor, an AI data company building RL environments for frontier labs and application-layer companies. Scaled the company to 2.5M expert hours per quarter and a $1-2B revenue run rate, serving all leading AI labs and companies like Harvey, Cursor, and Ramp.

3 calls·3 names·67% bull·last heard last month·Sequoia Capital
track record

no scored calls yet — needs a stated position or a categorical verdict, with a matured window vs SPY

top calls

highest conviction · one per company
1sthigh conviction
$MERCORMercorposition

Mercor hits $2B revenue run rate as primary agentic data vendor to frontier labs

Mercor has become the primary agentic data vendor for all leading AI labs and application companies, scaling to 2.5M expert hours per quarter and doubling revenue run rate to $2B in four months by building RL environments across every economic domain.

Sequoia Capital2026-08episode →
2ndmedium conviction
$NVDANvidia

Nvidia willing to pay billion for frontier model data

Nvidia is willing to pay approximately a billion dollars for a frontier open-source model, indicating the high value the company places on high-quality training data for AI development.

Sequoia Capital2026-08episode →
3rdmedium conviction
$CURSORCursor

Cursor proves application layer companies can build industry-leading models as moat

Cursor demonstrates that application-layer AI companies can build frontier models that create enormous customer value, and this pattern will replicate across dozens of verticals as companies own their intelligence as a competitive moat.

Sequoia Capital2026-08episode →

most discussed · click a bar to filter

  • $NVDA
  • $MERCOR
  • $CURSOR

recurring themes

  • AI Agents1
  • Enterprise AI Adoption1
  • AI Talent & Labor Market1
  • AI Economics & Business Models1
  • Frontier AI Models1
3 total
$NVDA
···
Nvidia
MEDbrendan foody·Sequoia Capital·last month·How RL Environments Are Built, and Why They're Your AI Moat | Brendan Foody, Mercor
Nvidia willing to pay billion for frontier model data
Nvidia is willing to pay approximately a billion dollars for a frontier open-source model, indicating the high value the company places on high-quality training data for AI development.
"when we think about a company like Nvidia, they're probably willing to pay a billion dollars to have a frontier open-source model"
13:13
$MERCOR
Mercor
HIGHbrendan foody·Sequoia Capital·last month·How RL Environments Are Built, and Why They're Your AI Moat | Brendan Foody, Mercor· position
Mercor hits $2B revenue run rate as primary agentic data vendor to frontier labs
Mercor has become the primary agentic data vendor for all leading AI labs and application companies, scaling to 2.5M expert hours per quarter and doubling revenue run rate to $2B in four months by building RL environments across every economic domain.
"Record, I think you guys grew from a 1 to a 2 billion dollar revenue run rate in the last 4 months or so. Um, so this company's off to the races and I think you were just so front…"
2:00
$CURSOR
Cursor
MEDbrendan foody·Sequoia Capital·last month·How RL Environments Are Built, and Why They're Your AI Moat | Brendan Foody, Mercor
Cursor proves application layer companies can build industry-leading models as moat
Cursor demonstrates that application-layer AI companies can build frontier models that create enormous customer value, and this pattern will replicate across dozens of verticals as companies own their intelligence as a competitive moat.
"Andrew talked about how Cursor was a great first example of how an application layer company could build a industry-leading model that, you know, built an enormous amount of value…"
10:07
8
AI Agentstailwind
RL environments emerge as the new data moat for agent post-training
The shift from crowdsourced behavior cloning to expert-built RL environments — comprising realistic worlds, app clones, and verifiable tasks — is becoming the primary differentiator for AI companies. Application-layer firms that build custom RL environments for their vertical will own their intelligence and create durable competitive moats, as demonstrated by Cursor and Harvey.
8
Enterprise AI Adoptiontailwind
Application companies will increasingly own their intelligence via custom post-training
Over the next 12 months, dozens of application-layer companies will follow Cursor's example by building industry-leading models through proprietary RL post-training data. Owning the intelligence layer — not just wrapping APIs — becomes the key source of moat and value creation in vertical AI.
7
AI Talent & Labor Markettailwind
Expert human networks become critical infrastructure for verifying frontier AI capabilities
Mercor's expert network scaled to 2.5M hours in Q2 with accelerating growth. Humans remain essential because models cannot reliably grade their own outputs beyond the current frontier — akin to students grading their own homework. This creates a labor-intensive but defensible moat for data providers.
7
AI Economics & Business Modelstailwind
New data economy emerges with per-task pricing ($50-$10k) and lab-scale demand
Frontier labs now purchase up to 50,000 tasks/month at custom prices, while off-the-shelf datasets represent hundreds of millions in upfront investment. Expert human time costs ~$150/hour, creating a high-margin, scalable data production model where differentiation drives pricing power.
6
Frontier AI Modelsmixed
Base models need pass@16 > pass@1 capability to effectively learn from RL environments
For RL post-training to work, the base model must occasionally solve tasks correctly when sampling multiple trajectories (pass@16) even if it fails on single attempts (pass@1). Parameter count influences trainability, and weaker models can distill from stronger ones (e.g., learning from Kimi K3-generated tasks), defining the capability threshold for viable RL training.